The High-Rise Building Multiple Entry Vertical Escape Technology
1968 - 2001
Archive
|
History will shows that:
THOUSANDS COULD HAVE SAVED THEIR LIVES IN THE WTC
|
ABC
Picture
|
People that were trapped above the floor levels impacted could have
been evacuated by only one set of four or five units of ZEC-EM, remaining
operative over 25, in few minutes.
The Zephinie Escape Chute (ZEC)
can operate over 100 floors.
Can evacuate up 1000 persons per minute, including handicapped ,
injured persons with the same average escape speed.
Ignorance or bad will
can't invalidate demonstrable
facts.
|
|
1974
Fire code enclosed ZEC escape chute
|
 Français
|
Acceuil
|
Español
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Entry SE
|
|
|
25 years Applications
|
|
|
Historic Archive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZEC's Licensees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ave2853
|
Several
swindlers, including Ingstrom, falsely declare having
invented the "Zephinie" Vertical Escape Chute
technology
|
Recently a gentleman doing business with some Ingstrom
associates in Asia could not believe that G. Zephinie was the
Inventor and Founder of the Zephinie Vertical Escape Chute
Technology, abused by the affirmation that Ingstrom was the
original inventor of the technology (please see The
Scandinavian pirates of the ZEC Historic Archive
The following documents show the facsimile French patent of
Certificat d'addition of the French patent 1.604.702 of the 18th of April 1968, filed
June 5, 1973 by Gerard J. Zephinie ( Exhibit # 1) and later extended under
priority regulation to many countries including the USA where the
patent have been divided into three difference patents finally
published during in 1976 and 1977 # 3,977,476, 3,977,495 etc... ( Exhibit # 2,
3.4.5 )
The development of the ZEC account over
20 original inventions, only those been considered as
essential have been patented. The cost to eventually patent of the
inventions was to high. However the no patented inventions where
publicly documented to secure the public domain anteriority
status and the copyright anteriority.
The hereafter included document that show
definitely that the ZEC stated to be developed 14 years before
Ingstrom got illegally the full Engineering and Marketing package of
the ZEC technology in 1980.
If eventually some, swindlers, slickers, hucksters or as you want to mane
them, have abused of your confidence and your money
including tightening you with draconian contracts of franchise
or distribution of forgery of the ZEC technology, we will happy to
help you to get rid of it. We can help you also to get a
original product of strict qualities much cheaper. We will
never accept to conceder as decent business competitor anyone having
originally obtained the technology trough the Insgtrom
ring.
Those founding a worldwide business Lying and
Swindling eventually thousands of good faith confidents
peoples are what they are.
However those having be adverted and documented of the sort of
business ethic of that we are talking and think to keep doing
business that way, definitely would considered as
belonging to the same sort of business gamblers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invalid Patent having been used for
abusing
Not only some crooks lie affirming that their are the inventors and
founders of the Vertical Escape Technology but including have
used the Invalid French patent # 82 16 127 registered at
the name of Jean-Paul Marechal the 24 of September
1982 regarding the modular chute used in fire ladder
evacuation.
This document went to our knowledge via a company having paid an
important sum to obtain the exclusive right to sell the Ingstrom
Escape Chute.
It have been largely publicized years ago the the ZEC was a French
invention, so that allowed Marechal to impersonalise the French
inventor of the Ingstrom chute.
In fact this patent is the strict description of one
of the chutes that the swindler group never have paid
for the Ascenter Otis (Otis France) Company.
Said patent describe the EVZ Mobil model that was in
the public domain since 1974 . The EVZ Mobil have been
certified 7 years before by the French government (1975)
fact proving legally the complete Invalidity of the said
document .
JP. Marechal have been for a time G. Zephinie's brother's partner
for the purpose to commercialize the Evacuation Vertical
Zephinie.
|
|
Example of Ingstrom and associates
ethic of scientific communication:
They announce in the The Singapore Institute of Architects
(SIA) a national organization representing architects in Singapore,
The Breakthrough in Technology From .... Escape Consult Mobiltex
(S) Pte Ltd has introduced the Multi-Entry system of the INGSTROM Escape Chute, developed by AB Mobiltex OY
, that means the 1973 and yet unchallenged Zephinie
Multiple Entry Vertical Fire Escape Technology !
|
Breakthrough in Technology
|
Ad Number:
|
242
|
Date Posted:
|
03/26/2001
|
Contact:
|
JN
|
Telephone:
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
Web Site:
|
|
Description
Escape
Consult Mobiltex (S) Pte Ltd has introduced the
Multi-Entry system of the INGSTROM Escape Chute, developed by AB Mobiltex OY
to
supplement the
fire escape stairs and fireman's lifts in aiding vertical
escape during
emergencies.
This system is designed to accomodate multiple entry for
vertical escape in multi-storey buildings. It takes less
gross floor area of space for the construction of the
vertical shaft in comparison to a fire stairwell or a lift
shaft. The chute is installed in segment at each floor
level inside
the protected shaft, one segment of chute per storey, from
the highest floor to the ground floor on the same vertical
line.
Unlike the fire staircase which can only be used by
able-bodied people, the facility does not have stairs, enabling the
disabled or injured on stretcher to escape easily. The escape chute enables as
many as 30 people a minute to be evacuated from a burning building in
difficult conditions. Furthermore, it needs no power supply to
operate, allowing it to be operational for evacuation during a power
outage.
This system not only adds another level of life safety
measure of egress in the
built environment but also serves as a better alternative
to climbing to the rescue. With an additional means of vertical escape,
rescue and evacuation
operations can be carried out simultaneously during an
emergency.
Furthermore, the special group can be spared the agony and
danger of walking down
long flight of stairs. Thus, it helps to make mass
evacuation even quicker and relatively safer in any
high rise scenario.
To make egress in buildings more elderly-friendly,
architects can
incorporate this additional safety measure into the
building design to
supplement the required minimum emergency exit for aiding
vertical escape.
|
|
Every thing is true excepting to mention that Ingstrom and
associates got the technology from a stolen engineering package of
Zephinie's vertical escape technology 20 years ago!
|
Proofs show that Ingstrom used for
years stolen engineering documents of the ZEC -EVZ including to
illustrate the Ingstrom escape chute commercial
brochures
|
Exhibit # 7
Facsimile of a page that Ingstrom used during the 80's to
promote the Ingstrom escape chute .
Ingstrom has not simply "imitated"
the ZEC technology but systematically abused shamelessly in every
details
from the extremely wide and precise engineering development
managed by Zephinie in the period 1975 -1976.
|
Exhibit # 8
The illustrations used by Ingstrom in Exhibit #7 is found in the
page No. 29 of a 55 pages of a internal manual made by Pamias
Ingeneria S.A of Barcelona, Spain in 1976 for
Señalizacion Industriales S.A. and EVZ including the
fundamental illustrations of the Technology designed in every
details by G. Zephinie.
Ingstrom abused of the 55 pages and of everything
!
|
More documents would eventually be added
regarding fallacious representations of the ZEC technology
since 1980
Please see also:
|
|
Ave2853
...
|
