The High-Rise Building Multiple Entry Vertical Escape Technology
1968 - 2001
Archive
|
History will shows that:
THOUSANDS COULD HAVE SAVED THEIR LIVES IN THE WTC
|

ABC
Picture
|
People that were trapped above the floor levels impacted could have
been evacuated by only one set of four or five units of ZEC-EM, remaining
operative over 25, in few minutes.
The Zephinie Escape Chute (ZEC)
can operate over 100 floors.
Can evacuate up 1000 persons per minute, including handicapped ,
injured persons with the same average escape speed.
Ignorance or bad will
can't invalidate demonstrable
facts.
|
|

1974
Fire code enclosed ZEC escape chute
|
Français
|
Acceuil
|
Español
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Entry SE
|
|
|
25 years Applications
|
|
|
Historic Archive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZEC's Licensees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Press release for the information of the
firefighters of America:
High-rise building mass evacuation.
Could be used a Fire Code approved evacuation technology exclusively marketed in
Europe by a Major US corporation since 1975 and still unknowns in the USA?
Such question seams not to makes a politically correct subject of curiosity
since October 2001.
Specialists know since 1972 that Arabs' terrorist attacks on NYC high-rise
buildings were to be expected. 3000<5000 causalities also were expected as a result of "non-evacuation
rule" in case of attack, Insurance used such figures for effective
evaluation.
The particular risks were not ignored but $billions of business potential was
associated with NY local Law #5. Business would depend on non-evacuation
official enforcement and the "defend-in-place" was enforced. The new evacuation technique created embarrassments and was and remains yet
unfairly opposed.
Historian will remember the so called "defend-in-place" NY local law
enforcement as a monumental example of "lobbied" irresponsible
imprudence. Opposing HIGH-RISE BUILDING STRUCTURAL FIRE PREVENTION against available
HIGH-RISE BUILDING EVACUATION OPTION remains a feckless position.
In memory of those having perished for local regulation opposing evacuation and
to prevent such recurrence, it is to hopes that brave active or retired members
of the NYFD will consider to review the official local position about High-Rise
building evacuation and render due justice to the ZEC-ME.
Asking if the system works in 2002 is not serious considering 25 years
involvement of a major US Corp having engaged internationally its legal and
public image guaranty on the ZEC evacuation since 1975. Fire engineering understanding should evidence the difference between escape
chute and ZEC-ME technique.
History will impartially judge, meantime, please, take a chance to learn and
judge by you that high-rise building mass evacuation is not a technical but
political problem since 1977.
http://escape-chute.freewwwtools.org/
Zephinie's three basic evacuation techniques are now commune technologies
available for the good of all.
Sincerely
Gerard Zephinie Industrial Designer - Inventor - Philosopher
For Additional Information, Please Contact: Gerard Zephinie
http://escape-chute.freewwwtools.org/
Tel: France - 0681661046 oversea dial: 33668166104 Boissy Saint Leger
94470 - France
Note. Sorry about eventual syntax errors because English is my third foreign language
and not read proofing help.
[ Back ] [ Next ]
|